Illinois Outdoors at PrairiestateOutdoors.com
RulesIllinois Outdoors at PrairiestateOutdoors.com

Prairie State Outdoors Categories

Top Story :: Opinion :: Illinois Outdoor News :: Fishing News :: Hunting News :: Birding News :: Nature Stories :: Miscellaneous News :: Fishing :: Big Fish Fridays :: Big Fish Stories :: State Fishing Reports :: Other Fishing Reports :: Fishing Tips, Tactics & Tales :: Where to Fish :: Fishing Calendar :: Hunting :: Hunting Reports :: Hunting Tips, Tactics & Tales :: Where to Hunt :: Tales from the Timber :: Turkey Tales :: Hunting Calendar :: Big Game Stories :: Nature and Birding :: Birding Bits :: Nature Newsbits :: Critter Corner :: Birding Calendar :: Stargazing :: In the Wild :: Miscellaneous Reports and Shorts :: Links :: Hunting Links :: Birding Links :: Video ::

Big Buck Stories

1960s :: 1980s :: 1991-92 :: 1992-93 :: 1993-94 :: 1994-95 :: 1995-96 :: 1997-98 :: 1998-99 :: 1999-2000 :: 2000-01 :: 2001-02 :: 2003-04 :: 2004-05 :: 2005-06 :: 2006-07 :: 2007-08 :: 2008-09 :: 2009-10 :: 2010-11 :: 2011-12 :: 2012-13 ::

Scattershooting

Flathead's Picture of the Week :: Big bucks :: Birdwatching :: Cougars :: Dogs :: Critters :: Fishing :: Asian carp :: Bass :: Catfish :: Crappie :: Ice :: Muskie :: Humor :: Hunting :: Deer :: Ducks :: Geese :: Turkey :: Upland game :: Misc. :: Mushrooms :: Open Blog Thursday :: Picture A Day 2010 :: Plants and trees :: Politics :: Prairie :: Scattershooting :: Tales from the Trail Cams :: Wild Things ::


Print

Ohio wildlife workers’ statements can’t be used against them

May 30, 2013 at 08:52 AM

The Associated Press

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Statements made by five state wildlife officials during an internal investigation can't be used against them in a criminal case, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.

The unanimous decision likely ends a 2010 prosecution of the five Ohio Division of Wildlife employees, because a prosecutor was on record saying the statements were a chief piece of evidence.

At issue were answers the employees provided during an Inspector General investigation into allegations that another Wildlife employee had illegally provided an out-of-state colleague with an Ohio hunting license at a discount.

The U.S. Supreme Court previously determined that statements by public employees during internal investigations typically can't be used in criminal cases if the employees spoke as a condition of keeping their jobs, Justice Judith French said in the state Supreme Court's decision.

That ruling clearly applies in this case, since the employees spoke to an Inspector General investigator after being warned by the Natural Resources department that "their failure to do so would subject them to disciplinary action up to and including termination," French said.

The court rejected the Brown County prosecutor's characterization of the Inspector General as a "toothless agency" with little or no powers over state employees.

The agency has broad powers to investigate wrongdoing and while it cannot directly discipline state employees, it can refer its findings to state agencies for possible discipline, French wrote.

Brown County prosecutor Jessica Little plans to dismiss the charges, saying she has no case without the statements.

"There's no sense going forward with a prosecution when you're not able to obtain a conviction," she said.

Attorneys for the employees, some of them still working for the Wildlife division, praised the court's decision.

"They did not deserve to be subjected to criminal prosecution," said John Woliver, representing employee Randy Miller, who has since retired. "They exemplify the type of public servants Ohio is fortunate to have."

The ruling should end the prosecution, said attorney Michael Dobyns, who represents Todd Haines, who remains with Natural Resources.

"The only evidence she had was that which was obtained by the Inspector General," Dobyns said. "If the statements are now suppressed, I don't believe there's any other evidence she can move forward on."

The Inspector General's probe looked into the state's internal investigation of the allegation over the hunting license discount.

In that case, former Wildlife officer Allan Wright was convicted last year in federal court of helping a South Carolina hunter illegally obtain an Ohio deer license at a discount that saved him about $105.

Wright also was convicted of seizing the antlers of two deer taken illegally and giving the antlers to a friend instead of securing them as crime evidence.

A federal judge ordered probation, house arrest and a $1,000 fine for Wright, who was fired by the Natural Resources Department in 2011.

Government prosecutors said the case involved a pattern of criminal conduct and that Wright's actions jeopardized the honor system that is the backbone of state hunting and fishing programs.

___

Andrew Welsh-Huggins can be reached on Twitter at https://twitter.com/awhcolumbus.


Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.

Your CommentsComments :: Terms :: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Comment Area Pool Rules

  1. Read our Terms of Service.
  2. You must be a member. :: Register here :: Log In
  3. Keep it clean.
  4. Stay on topic.
  5. Be civil, honest and accurate.
  6. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Log In

Register as a new member

Next entry: Ted Takasaki: Hot tips for cool panfishing results

Previous entry: Kids fishing tournament coming up at Lake Shelbyville June 8

Log Out

RSS & Atom Feeds

Prairie State Outdoors
PSO on Facebook
Promote Your Page Too

News Archives

May 2017
S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Copyright © 2007-2014 GateHouse Media, Inc.
Some Rights Reserved
Original content available for non-commercial use
under a Creative Commons license, except where noted.
Creative Commons