Illinois Outdoors at PrairiestateOutdoors.com
RulesIllinois Outdoors at PrairiestateOutdoors.com

Prairie State Outdoors Categories

Top Story :: Opinion :: Illinois Outdoor News :: Fishing News :: Hunting News :: Birding News :: Nature Stories :: Miscellaneous News :: Fishing :: Big Fish Fridays :: Big Fish Stories :: State Fishing Reports :: Other Fishing Reports :: Fishing Tips, Tactics & Tales :: Where to Fish :: Fishing Calendar :: Hunting :: Hunting Reports :: Hunting Tips, Tactics & Tales :: Where to Hunt :: Tales from the Timber :: Turkey Tales :: Hunting Calendar :: Big Game Stories :: Nature and Birding :: Birding Bits :: Nature Newsbits :: Critter Corner :: Birding Calendar :: Stargazing :: In the Wild :: Miscellaneous Reports and Shorts :: Links :: Hunting Links :: Birding Links :: Video ::

Big Buck Stories

1960s :: 1980s :: 1991-92 :: 1992-93 :: 1993-94 :: 1994-95 :: 1995-96 :: 1997-98 :: 1998-99 :: 1999-2000 :: 2000-01 :: 2001-02 :: 2003-04 :: 2004-05 :: 2005-06 :: 2006-07 :: 2007-08 :: 2008-09 :: 2009-10 :: 2010-11 :: 2011-12 :: 2012-13 ::

Scattershooting

Flathead's Picture of the Week :: Big bucks :: Birdwatching :: Cougars :: Dogs :: Critters :: Fishing :: Asian carp :: Bass :: Catfish :: Crappie :: Ice :: Muskie :: Humor :: Hunting :: Deer :: Ducks :: Geese :: Turkey :: Upland game :: Misc. :: Mushrooms :: Open Blog Thursday :: Picture A Day 2010 :: Plants and trees :: Politics :: Prairie :: Scattershooting :: Tales from the Trail Cams :: Wild Things ::


Print

Sequester could hold back funds for fish, wildlife

March 21, 2013 at 08:06 PM

The State Journal-Register

The federal government’s efforts to control deficit spending through sequestration eventually could affect how much money is returned to states for wildlife and fish restoration programs.

States receive matching funds from the federal government through the Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson Acts that divide an 11 percent excise taxes on sporting goods between state fish and wildlife agencies.

Illinois’ share typically is about $16 million dollars.

The sequestration — known as the Budget Control Act — requires a 7.6 percent cut to “other non-exempt, non-defense mandatory programs,” including wildlife funds even though they are not raised through the federal income tax.

The goal of the Budget Control Act is to reduce the federal budget deficit by $1.2 trillion in 10 years.

According to the Association of State Fish and Wildlife Agencies, the total amount withheld from the states would be $74 million in fiscal year 2013.

If the entire 7.6 percent is held back, Illinois could find about $1.2 million off limits.

“Since this is a trust fund, the excise tax monies will not be diverted to other uses, but will not be allocated to the states at the (same rate as in past years),” said Dan Stephenson, assistant chief of fisheries for the Illinois Department of Natural Resources.

The money won’t be used to pay down the federal deficit, but will reside in a trust fund in Washington — making it unavailable to the states, at least not until the sequester ends.

“They can’t take it out of the trust funds, but they aren’t going to appropriate it,” said Mike Conlin, retired DNR fisheries chief. “It looks like they are holding back spending but they really aren’t. I think it’s partly for show or maybe all for show.”

Conlin said federal funds normally are reimbursed to the states, such as when a research project is completed.

He said DNR might not feel the effects until the next fiscal year.
“But as time passes, it will impact us more and more,” Stephenson said. “The sooner they fix this in Washington, the less the impact.”
Using DNR fisheries as an example, $9.7 million was received from fishing license sales in 2011 and $7.1 million came in as federal matching funds, Stephenson said.

If the entire 7.6 percent sequestration is held back, about $550,000 of that $7.1 million will be unavailable to DNR fisheries.

Stephenson said fisheries was expecting an additional $1.5 million from the new “Sustainability Bill” that adds a $2 surcharge on license plate renewals to help replace aging equipment and hire additional personnel.

“But we’re afraid that money will be in place of (funds held back), not in addition to.”

DNR spokesman Chris McCloud said the agency is planning for any number of budget scenarios “so we are protected as possible.

“If any money is withheld, that would affect the agency,” he said. “All we can do is try to keep an eye on it.”

Chris Young can be reached at (217) 788-1528. Follow him at twitter.com/ChrisYoungPSO.

Your CommentsComments :: Terms :: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

This is riddiculous. How can the Federal Government with-hold “Trust Funds,” which are set-aside specifically for Fish and Wildlife projects.  Sports-men have been paying this excise tax on fishing tackle (Dingell-Johnson)and on firearms and ammunition (Pittman-Robertson)under these two Acts for years and that money was authorized by Congress to be used only for that purpose.  As many here will recall, former governor (now jailbird)Blagojevich got caught diverting these funds into the General Fund, and the State had to pay the funds back.  So I guess these funds are going the way of the Social Security Trust Funds that also “were held by the Federal Government in Trust” for the Social Security recipients.  As I recall, all those funds have been raided and used for other purposes as well.  Does this mean that the Federal Government is going to withhold monies to the IDOT from the Highway User Tax Trust Fund that all of us pay on the gasoline and diesel fuels? Just when does this damned “transfer” of funding stop?

“...The money won’t be used to pay down the federal deficit, but will reside in a trust fund in Washington — making it unavailable to the states, at least not until the sequester ends…”

And, as I recall, the “Sustainability Bill” has nothing to do with the Federal Government, since the licensing of vehicles is a State Government program.  So why would it be cut back by the Federal Government in Washington, D.C.?  This whole article smacks of nothing but propaganda!  I’m disappointed by PSO for even running something like this in their newspaper.  And why would 959 Facebook readers “like” this article? IMHO…there’s nothing to like about getting robbed!

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 03/25 at 08:05 PM

The sportsmen’s groups of this state should just file a law suit over this, this is just wrong on so many fronts you just are not able to wrap your mind around it. I am sick of the clowns playing with our money, yes I said our money folks, and I guess its about time to let them know it. This is the type of news that make a person want to puke…........RTT

Posted by ringtailtrapper on 03/27 at 12:51 PM

Comment Area Pool Rules

  1. Read our Terms of Service.
  2. You must be a member. :: Register here :: Log In
  3. Keep it clean.
  4. Stay on topic.
  5. Be civil, honest and accurate.
  6. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Log In

Register as a new member

Next entry: Wis. DNR seeks input on new deer surveys

Previous entry: Diving duck study enters second year

Log Out

RSS & Atom Feeds

Prairie State Outdoors
PSO on Facebook
Promote Your Page Too

News Archives

July 2018
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Copyright © 2007-2014 GateHouse Media, Inc.
Some Rights Reserved
Original content available for non-commercial use
under a Creative Commons license, except where noted.
Creative Commons