Illinois Outdoors at
RulesIllinois Outdoors at

Prairie State Outdoors Categories

Top Story :: Opinion :: Illinois Outdoor News :: Fishing News :: Hunting News :: Birding News :: Nature Stories :: Miscellaneous News :: Fishing :: Big Fish Fridays :: Big Fish Stories :: State Fishing Reports :: Other Fishing Reports :: Fishing Tips, Tactics & Tales :: Where to Fish :: Fishing Calendar :: Hunting :: Hunting Reports :: Hunting Tips, Tactics & Tales :: Where to Hunt :: Tales from the Timber :: Turkey Tales :: Hunting Calendar :: Big Game Stories :: Nature and Birding :: Birding Bits :: Nature Newsbits :: Critter Corner :: Birding Calendar :: Stargazing :: In the Wild :: Miscellaneous Reports and Shorts :: Links :: Hunting Links :: Birding Links :: Video ::

Big Buck Stories

1960s :: 1980s :: 1991-92 :: 1992-93 :: 1993-94 :: 1994-95 :: 1995-96 :: 1997-98 :: 1998-99 :: 1999-2000 :: 2000-01 :: 2001-02 :: 2003-04 :: 2004-05 :: 2005-06 :: 2006-07 :: 2007-08 :: 2008-09 :: 2009-10 :: 2010-11 :: 2011-12 :: 2012-13 ::


Flathead's Picture of the Week :: Big bucks :: Birdwatching :: Cougars :: Dogs :: Critters :: Fishing :: Asian carp :: Bass :: Catfish :: Crappie :: Ice :: Muskie :: Humor :: Hunting :: Deer :: Ducks :: Geese :: Turkey :: Upland game :: Misc. :: Mushrooms :: Open Blog Thursday :: Picture A Day 2010 :: Plants and trees :: Politics :: Prairie :: Scattershooting :: Tales from the Trail Cams :: Wild Things ::


Hunter may have shot bear made famous by Internet

September 26, 2011 at 07:49 PM

The Associated Press

MINNEAPOLIS — Researchers fear a hunter may have killed a black bear named Hope who became famous when her birth in northeastern Minnesota was broadcast live to a worldwide audience over the Internet.

Lynn Rogers, senior biologist with the North American Bear Center and its affiliated Wildlife Research Institute, said Monday that Hope was last seen Sept. 14.

Rogers is waiting to hear from the Department of Natural Resources whether a hunter registered killing a bear matching the description of Hope. He said the local game warden told him he’d need to seek clearance from other DNR officials to release the information.

The center installed a camera inside Lily’s den and thousands of people watched over the Internet as Hope’s mother, Lily, give birth two winters ago.

Hope did not have a radio collar but often roamed with Lily, whose collar showed she visited the hunter’s bait station three times — on Sept. 15, 16 and 17. “Then she left and never returned to it. And Hope was never seen again,” Rogers said.

Lily’s Facebook page has over 132,000 fans and word of Hope’s potential demise has generated hundreds of postings on it, mostly from mourners and opponents of hunting. People in 132 counties and students at over 500 schools have been following the lives of Lily, Hope, and Lily’s youngest cub Faith, Rogers said. He said some teachers called him in tears over the weekend, asking what they should tell their students.

“There was so much we wanted to learn from this family,” Rogers said.

Rogers said he knows the hunter who maintained the bait station, and knows he would not shoot a radio-collared bear, which is legal but officially discouraged in Minnesota. He said the hunter answered some questions via email but did not say if he shot Hope.

“I’m figuring I’ll never release his name,” Rogers said, adding that the center’s goal is to “peacefully coexist with hunters. ... We just want to know what happened and go on from there.”

Still, Rogers said he has to wonder if the hunter deliberately sought out Hope. He said the hunter has posted messages before on a Facebook page with around 50 fans called “Lily: a bear with a bounty,” where some postings last week spoke of “Hope jerky” or Hope cooked in a crockpot.

“It’s disappointing to see people without a care about science, education and the region,” Rogers said.

Hope and Lily’s territory is far away from a forest fire that has blackened over 146 square miles east of Ely, but Rogers said the same drought conditions that fueled the fire also dried up this year’s wild berry crop, making hungry bears more likely to feed at bait stations. But he expressed doubt that Hope’s contacts with him and other researchers made the bear too trusting. He said hunters tell him the center’s research bears are actually more cautious about bait, though he doesn’t know why.

Minnesota’s bear hunting season opened Sept. 1. Bait stations are legal but must be registered. An estimated 9,200 hunters took a total of 2,699 bears last year for a success rate of 29 percent, according to DNR figures.

Dennis Simon, the DNR’s wildlife management section chief, said officials are tracking down information for Rogers on the ages and genders of bears registered in the area, which he said are public information. Names and addresses of the hunters are private, he said.

Simon said DNR officials don’t know what happened to Hope, but that any licensed hunter legally could have taken the bear. He also said the state’s black bear population is now largely under control after several years when expanding bear numbers led to increased conflicts with humans. He said the DNR now manages them to allowing recreational hunting while maintaining the species at sustainable levels.

Your CommentsComments :: Terms :: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Good Hunters don’t do this.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 09/26 at 08:41 PM

Don’t do what, legally hunt and take game?
You really should do some research before you jump on the Lynn Rogers/Anti bandwagon. Rogers has no right to any info about the hunter and if he really wanted to peacefully coexist he wouldn’t make the inflammatory statements that he does. Just another drama queen with a cause and getting paid for it. Really naming wild bears?

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 09/27 at 07:40 AM

They arent really “wild bears”.  I go to the Ely area every year, have seen a few of the Bears in this study / documentary.. and have even fed one by hand.  They are local celebrities.  A couple of them are radio collared, while some of their offspring, and other ‘regulars’ are not. 
The bear in question did NOT have a collar on.  How was anyone to know if this bear was one of the tame, hand raised, tv stars… or a completely wild bear?

Bad publicity for both sides.  Has the ‘bambi’ effect on hunters, and shows that the bunny huggers do more harm than good by domesticating these wild animals, and ultimately set them up for failure.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 09/27 at 10:08 AM

Nothing against bear hunters, but sitting over a garbage can in a tree is not my idea of hunting anyway.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 09/27 at 11:15 AM

Well of course they aren’t going to be wild if you drive to Ely Mn. and hand feed them and that is my point, you take a wild animal give them a name, hand feed them and cam them having babies, naming the babies cute little names and posting their pictures all over the net to get a sympathetic following to keep your tourist trap open.
I first started going to Ely in the 70s. I drive in and get supplies and drive to the forest where I see the wildlife, as it should be. BTW haven’t they radio collared enough bears; everyone already knows they poop in the woods.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 09/27 at 12:32 PM

like I said I dont care how anyone hunts I just dont hunt over food plots that were planted for the sole purpose of luring wildlife or like texas ranchs where deer from a feed line at the feed buckets just not my idea of hunting. May as well raise a buffalo a shoot it in a couple years.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 09/27 at 01:15 PM

I don’t see the problem. I personally would not find much satisfaction in bear hunting but if it was in season with legal equipment, tags, and on legal property then there’s nothing to do but write Hope’s obituary.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 09/27 at 01:29 PM

Note to North American Bear Center…don’t do that!
Placing cameras on legal game is not the best way to promote nature. Works fine for eagles and other protected species.  Can’t fault the hunter if he followed the rules. I can understand why the general public has responded this way.  The fellows comments (if real) were a tad callous. I just hope they don’t strap a camera to the butt of a new born fawn and follow it through hunting season…bad idea.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 09/27 at 02:51 PM

This would be a non-story except for the comments ““Lily: a bear with a bounty,” where some postings last week spoke of “Hope jerky” or Hope cooked in a crockpot” Those comments do make the hunter look like a jerk. Without those you have a legal species, an open season, and a properly licensed hunter.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 09/28 at 06:41 AM

This guy was no hunter if there is any truth to this story.

Posted by HawgNSonsTV on 09/29 at 08:26 PM

Comment Area Pool Rules

  1. Read our Terms of Service.
  2. You must be a member. :: Register here :: Log In
  3. Keep it clean.
  4. Stay on topic.
  5. Be civil, honest and accurate.
  6. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Log In

Register as a new member

Next entry: Virginia lake sells for $243,000

Previous entry: Nature and economics conflict when it comes to preserving cemetery’s savanna

Log Out

RSS & Atom Feeds

Prairie State Outdoors
PSO on Facebook
Promote Your Page Too

News Archives

February 2020
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Copyright © 2007-2014 GateHouse Media, Inc.
Some Rights Reserved
Original content available for non-commercial use
under a Creative Commons license, except where noted.
Creative Commons