Illinois Outdoors at
RulesIllinois Outdoors at

Prairie State Outdoors Categories

Top Story :: Opinion :: Illinois Outdoor News :: Fishing News :: Hunting News :: Birding News :: Nature Stories :: Miscellaneous News :: Fishing :: Big Fish Fridays :: Big Fish Stories :: State Fishing Reports :: Other Fishing Reports :: Fishing Tips, Tactics & Tales :: Where to Fish :: Fishing Calendar :: Hunting :: Hunting Reports :: Hunting Tips, Tactics & Tales :: Where to Hunt :: Tales from the Timber :: Turkey Tales :: Hunting Calendar :: Big Game Stories :: Nature and Birding :: Birding Bits :: Nature Newsbits :: Critter Corner :: Birding Calendar :: Stargazing :: In the Wild :: Miscellaneous Reports and Shorts :: Links :: Hunting Links :: Birding Links :: Video ::

Big Buck Stories

1960s :: 1980s :: 1991-92 :: 1992-93 :: 1993-94 :: 1994-95 :: 1995-96 :: 1997-98 :: 1998-99 :: 1999-2000 :: 2000-01 :: 2001-02 :: 2003-04 :: 2004-05 :: 2005-06 :: 2006-07 :: 2007-08 :: 2008-09 :: 2009-10 :: 2010-11 :: 2011-12 :: 2012-13 ::


Flathead's Picture of the Week :: Big bucks :: Birdwatching :: Cougars :: Dogs :: Critters :: Fishing :: Asian carp :: Bass :: Catfish :: Crappie :: Ice :: Muskie :: Humor :: Hunting :: Deer :: Ducks :: Geese :: Turkey :: Upland game :: Misc. :: Mushrooms :: Open Blog Thursday :: Picture A Day 2010 :: Plants and trees :: Politics :: Prairie :: Scattershooting :: Tales from the Trail Cams :: Wild Things ::


EPA denies petition to ban lead in fishing tackle

November 07, 2010 at 01:24 PM

Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Environmental Protection Agency denied on Thursday a petition by several environmental groups to ban lead in fishing tackle, two months after rejecting the groups’ attempt to ban it in hunting ammunition.

The EPA said that the petition did not demonstrate that a ban on lead in fishing tackle was necessary to protect against unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment, as required by the Toxic Substances Control Act.

In a letter to the American Bird Conservancy, one of the groups that filed the petition, EPA Assistant Administrator Stephen A. Owens said that a number of steps are being taken to address the concerns of lead in fishing tackle. Among them: limitations of lead in fishing gear on some federal lands; bans or restrictions on the state level; and federal and state outreach and education efforts.

“The emergence of these programs and activities over the past decade calls into question whether the broad rulemaking requested in your petition would be the least burdensome, adequately protective approach,” Owens wrote to the conservancy’s director of conservation advocacy, Michael Fry.

In their petition, the groups had argued that lead from spent hunting ammunition and lost lead fishing gear causes the deaths of 10 million to 20 million birds and other animals a year by lead poisoning.
Fry assailed the EPA’s decision. “The EPA has apparently completely abdicated its responsibility for regulating toxic lead in circumstances where wildlife are being poisoned,” he said.

Fry suggested the reason for the decision was politics: “The political appointees have acted in this administration not like heads of agencies, but like they’re running for office.”

In a statement, the EPA said: “This decision is based solely on an analysis of the facts and the law. EPA conducted a careful review of this petition and made a determination that the petitioners did not make the case that is required under (the law) to undertake a national ban on lead in fishing gear.”

The petition, filed three months ago, stoked alarm among outdoorsmen, and members of the House and Senate introduced legislation aimed at preventing the EPA from regulating ammunition or fishing tackle.

The American Sportfishing Association praised the EPA announcement.

“It represents a solid review of the biological facts, as well as the economic and social impacts that would have resulted from such a sweeping federal action,” said group vice president Gordon Robertson.

“It is a commonsense decision.” He argued that a lead ban would increase costs and price out many anglers, which in turn would decrease tax and license revenue for fisheries conservation.

In 1994, under President Bill Clinton and EPA administrator Carol Browner, now White House energy adviser, the EPA actually proposed banning lead and zinc in certain smaller-size fishing sinkers. The agency said in a statement at the time: “The ingestion of even one small fishing sinker containing lead or zinc can result in the death of a water bird.”

The proposal sparked a backlash in Congress. Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, introduced the “Common Sense in Fishing Regulations Act” in 1995 that would have blocked the EPA from implementing it. The agency eventually abandoned the proposal.

The American Bird Conservancy filed the petition in August along with the Center for Biological Diversity, the Association of Avian Veterinarians, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility and a hunters group called Project Gutpile, seeking a ban on lead in both hunting ammunition and fishing tackle.

The petition cited nearly 500 peer-reviewed scientific articles that the groups said document the toxic effects of lead on wildlife. These studies “conclude that the lead components of bullets, shotgun pellets, fishing weights and lures pose an unreasonable risk of injury to human and wildlife health and the environment,” the Aug. 3 petition argued.

The EPA earlier rejected the ammunition part of the petition, saying it didn’t have authority under the Toxic Substances Control Act, but that it would make a decision on the part pertaining to fishing tackle. In September, 60 groups wrote to EPA administrator Lisa Jackson asking her to grant the petition for both ammunition and tackle.

Your CommentsComments :: Terms :: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Thank you to all that contacted your local representatives and getting this ridiculous petition tossing out.


Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 11/08 at 07:49 AM

I would like to know where some of these groups come up with these numbers, 10-20 million birds & other animals. Is this state or nation wide? I would think as sportsmen & women, and with websites like this, it would be mentioned if we all started seeing this many dead birds & animals ourselves and start asking what was going on and if anybody else was seeing all these dead animals. I would be more likely to say that tangled fishing line left by some nuckleheads does more damage to wild life than lead does. Or something like the West Nile disease, I sure see a lot less Crows now than before that showed up here.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 11/08 at 11:13 AM

hi tony ,I agree totally..hows things over at the catfishacademy..aint check in over there in awhile..slick skin.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 11/09 at 09:00 PM

I wouldn’t say this is a victory for outdoorsman/women but it is a sure stop sign to groups hell bent on limiting outdoor activities. lead has been used foa very very long time and i would aswell love to see where these groups get their numbers on these 10’s of millions of birds and other animals dying from lead. IL dnr is strict on lead, just last week I was stopped and had all my shells checked with a magnet to make sure i was not duck hunting with lead. of course i wasn’t but they are out there and checking. these groups won’t stop but a good sign like this will slow them down. thank you all who took action.

Posted by menardhunter72 on 11/11 at 08:17 AM

I agree with the above comments. berlin the mono left laying around really gets me when it’s so easy to stuff into a pocket and dispose of properly. In my boat I use a coffee container with a plastic lid, a couple of rocks for weight and a X cut in the top keeps waste from flying out.BTW if you use a metal can put a plastic lid on the bottom as well as the top or it will leave a rust ring on your carpet lol.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 11/12 at 07:17 AM

Comment Area Pool Rules

  1. Read our Terms of Service.
  2. You must be a member. :: Register here :: Log In
  3. Keep it clean.
  4. Stay on topic.
  5. Be civil, honest and accurate.
  6. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Log In

Register as a new member

Next entry: Hunting roundup: cooler weather on order

Previous entry: Hunters and drivers get ready: peak of the rut is just days away

Log Out

RSS & Atom Feeds

Prairie State Outdoors
PSO on Facebook
Promote Your Page Too

News Archives

February 2020
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Copyright © 2007-2014 GateHouse Media, Inc.
Some Rights Reserved
Original content available for non-commercial use
under a Creative Commons license, except where noted.
Creative Commons