Illinois Outdoors at
RulesIllinois Outdoors at

Prairie State Outdoors Categories

Top Story :: Opinion :: Illinois Outdoor News :: Fishing News :: Hunting News :: Birding News :: Nature Stories :: Miscellaneous News :: Fishing :: Big Fish Fridays :: Big Fish Stories :: State Fishing Reports :: Other Fishing Reports :: Fishing Tips, Tactics & Tales :: Where to Fish :: Fishing Calendar :: Hunting :: Hunting Reports :: Hunting Tips, Tactics & Tales :: Where to Hunt :: Tales from the Timber :: Turkey Tales :: Hunting Calendar :: Big Game Stories :: Nature and Birding :: Birding Bits :: Nature Newsbits :: Critter Corner :: Birding Calendar :: Stargazing :: In the Wild :: Miscellaneous Reports and Shorts :: Links :: Hunting Links :: Birding Links :: Video ::

Big Buck Stories

1960s :: 1980s :: 1991-92 :: 1992-93 :: 1993-94 :: 1994-95 :: 1995-96 :: 1997-98 :: 1998-99 :: 1999-2000 :: 2000-01 :: 2001-02 :: 2003-04 :: 2004-05 :: 2005-06 :: 2006-07 :: 2007-08 :: 2008-09 :: 2009-10 :: 2010-11 :: 2011-12 :: 2012-13 ::


Flathead's Picture of the Week :: Big bucks :: Birdwatching :: Cougars :: Dogs :: Critters :: Fishing :: Asian carp :: Bass :: Catfish :: Crappie :: Ice :: Muskie :: Humor :: Hunting :: Deer :: Ducks :: Geese :: Turkey :: Upland game :: Misc. :: Mushrooms :: Open Blog Thursday :: Picture A Day 2010 :: Plants and trees :: Politics :: Prairie :: Scattershooting :: Tales from the Trail Cams :: Wild Things ::


Editorial: Passing Minnesota hunting and fishing license fee increases just “common sense”

January 18, 2012 at 02:24 PM

The Associated Press

From the St. Cloud Times. Jan. 17, 2012:

The Minnesota Legislature has convened its 2012 session, and there is a simple legislative test that should be administered immediately so that Minnesotans can see whether this session will be about common-sense compromise or partisan politics.

The Legislature should be asked to approve increases in hunting and fishing license fees.

Several factors make this a good test. Topping that list is the inevitable fact that the state Department of Natural Resources’ Game and Fish Fund — the account that covers most fish and wildlife management programs and is funded largely by license fees — is on track to run out of money.

Its balance is projected to be at $6.7 million June 30, and it will drop to about $200,000 a year later if nothing changes. (About $95 million moves through the account annually.) The DNR told the Duluth News-Tribune that a balance that small poses a risk, especially if something unexpected happens.

Legally, the fund cannot go into the red, which means programs would have to be cut.

Leaders in the DNR cite these reasons for waning funds. First, fishing license fees have not changed since 2011, and most hunting licenses are at the same prices they were in 2000. (Quick! Name anything else that has not seen price increase in more than a decade.) Second, last year’s state shutdown cut license revenues by more than $1 million. And third, the state’s cut from federal excise taxes on outdoor products is lower than projected.

Many Minnesota anglers and hunters are acutely aware of the risks of red ink. That’s why many outdoor groups are lobbying the Legislature to approve fee increases. Yes, that’s right — these voters want to raise the fees they pay.

Finally, it must be noted that the DNR has been proactive in addressing this fiscal challenge. In the past three years it has reduced full-time fish and wildlife employees, compared license fees to other states and requested fee increases from the Legislature.

Gov. Mark Dayton in 2011 proposed raising resident angling licenses from $17 to $24, and resident deer licenses from $26 to $30. He and the DNR also offered several new licenses aimed at curbing the costs for teenagers and people who fish only a few months each year.

Those seem reasonable, but thanks to those “no new taxes” blinders, the Republican-led Legislature last year did not approve anything, nor did it offer any viable alternatives. Naturally, the problem did not go away, so now the Legislature must face the same dilemma: Either raise fees — which has the support of those who pay them — or force cuts to programs at the core of Minnesota’s outdoors legacy.

The common-sense answer is obvious.

Your CommentsComments :: Terms :: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Comment Area Pool Rules

  1. Read our Terms of Service.
  2. You must be a member. :: Register here :: Log In
  3. Keep it clean.
  4. Stay on topic.
  5. Be civil, honest and accurate.
  6. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Log In

Register as a new member

Next entry: Iowa DNR says deer harvest down 4 percent

Previous entry: Protestors want shooting of wild burros to stop

Log Out

RSS & Atom Feeds

Prairie State Outdoors
PSO on Facebook
Promote Your Page Too

News Archives

February 2020
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Copyright © 2007-2014 GateHouse Media, Inc.
Some Rights Reserved
Original content available for non-commercial use
under a Creative Commons license, except where noted.
Creative Commons